Forums Members Discord Donate Workshop Notifications  Admin
×

Well done

You currently don't have any notifications to read!

Anger's Warn Appeal

Locked
205 views
Staff members involved/staff who issued the warn: Anger
Your In-Game Name : Proxy
Steam ID : STEAM_0:0:142855826
Reasons for being unbanned : Well I never got banned. However, Basically I have been warned for "RDM". The thing that happened was this "Spymatter" Was asking people for hits as I was next to him I walked off all of a sudden spymatter decided to tail me, so i walked into a building where NO ONE was at the time of this going all the way upstairs and through my mic I said to spymatter "Come up here and you die" in a laughing tone. So I killed him knowing he was a hitman. The reason i believed to know that the hit was on me was as soon as i walked off he tailed me into a building. Later on he followed me all the way upstairs (WITH A GUN OUT). So it was kinda obvious that he had a hit on me.

I believe that this has been a false warn and I did nothing wrong.

Discord: MrProxy#8518
I'll get Anger to reply to this but from what you have said it looks like a perfectly fine warn as you would have had no way of knowing whether or not he had a hit on you. Unless he shot you first or you owned the building where this happened it would have been RDM because you cannot kill someone for having 'Hit Accepted' above their heads or just having a gun out as a hitman.

 What kind of bear is best?
Essentially speaking, what Proxy claimed was correct, unfortunately, everything he said was merely a hunch. He did not own the building that he was in, didn't advert warn 3x in chat nor was he shot first. He knew Spymatter had a hit because of the "Hit accepted" above his head, which is metagaming. Like I've explained to him on Discord (which I've gotten insulted for), asking for hits doesn't equate to actually getting them. Just because Spymatter followed him with a gun out isn't concrete evidence that Spymatter had a hit on him.
That's about it, really. I felt like a warn was necessary so a warn was given.
Sorry, but what? As far as I’m aware it’s pretty obvious that the hit was on me and that he had a hit in the first place. The reason I “insulted” you was for lying to me saying there where other players inside that building when there wasn’t. I mean if it isn’t enough for a player to follow you from one side of a district to another isn’t obvious then damn.

Discord: MrProxy#8518
Nope, can't do that. You need hard proof before shooting someone. Like I've stated previously, one of these conditions had to be met: You owning the building you were in, warning Spymatter 3x in the chat or him damaging you first. 
Spymatter could've followed you as long as he wanted, you still had to have an actual reason to shoot him. Suspecting him of a hit isn't a valid one, you need hard proof of him having a hit on you which you didn't have.
Also, I didn't lie about where you got killed. Reason as to why I didn't bring it up here was because:
1. I don't have a screenshot of where you died and don't think I'm gonna get one from the logs now
2. It's irrelevant where you died.

Point is, you had no actual evidence that Spymatter had a hit on you, simply that he was chasing you with a weapon out and you metagaming in order to find out he had a hit to begin with("Hit Accepted" over his head).
Already explained my side of the story, don't see a reason as to why I should reply further. 
Have a good one!
From everything I've gathered this is a valid warn. 
Denied

 What kind of bear is best?
Reply