Nope, can't do that. You need hard proof before shooting someone. Like I've stated previously, one of these conditions had to be met: You owning the building you were in, warning Spymatter 3x in the chat or him damaging you first.
Spymatter could've followed you as long as he wanted, you still had to have an actual reason to shoot him. Suspecting him of a hit isn't a valid one, you need hard proof of him having a hit on you which you didn't have.
Also, I didn't lie about where you got killed. Reason as to why I didn't bring it up here was because:
1. I don't have a screenshot of where you died and don't think I'm gonna get one from the logs now
2. It's irrelevant where you died.
Point is, you had no actual evidence that Spymatter had a hit on you, simply that he was chasing you with a weapon out and you metagaming in order to find out he had a hit to begin with("Hit Accepted" over his head).
Already explained my side of the story, don't see a reason as to why I should reply further.
Have a good one!
Nope, can't do that. You need hard proof before shooting someone. Like I've stated previously, one of these conditions had to be met: You owning the building you were in, warning Spymatter 3x in the chat or him damaging you first.
Spymatter could've followed you as long as he wanted, you still had to have an actual reason to shoot him. Suspecting him of a hit isn't a valid one, you need hard proof of him having a hit on you which you didn't have.
Also, I didn't lie about where you got killed. Reason as to why I didn't bring it up here was because:
1. I don't have a screenshot of where you died and don't think I'm gonna get one from the logs now
2. It's irrelevant where you died.
Point is, you had no actual evidence that Spymatter had a hit on you, simply that he was chasing you with a weapon out and you metagaming in order to find out he had a hit to begin with("Hit Accepted" over his head).
Already explained my side of the story, don't see a reason as to why I should reply further.
Have a good one!